Safety in autonomous systems
Investigating how AI agents can be evaluated, monitored and constrained, with effective human intervention when behaviour becomes unsafe.
Agentic AI · Runtime assuranceAdvancing research, evaluation and evidence-based assurance so AI systems work safely, fairly and reliably in African contexts.
AISTAI is an emerging initiative focused on safe and trustworthy artificial intelligence across Africa. Our ambition is to connect technical research with the evidence, institutions and human judgement needed for responsible deployment.
We place African languages, communities and operating environments at the centre of evaluation. From healthcare tools to financial decisions and autonomous agents, systems must be tested where their consequences are felt.
Our developing programme connects AI safety research, practical evaluations and assurance methods.
Investigating how AI agents can be evaluated, monitored and constrained, with effective human intervention when behaviour becomes unsafe.
Agentic AI · Runtime assuranceExamining reliability, fairness and relevance across African languages, datasets and deployment settings, including high-impact uses.
LLM evaluation · Bias · ExplainabilityDeveloping practical controls and evidence guidance that help institutions assess AI, identify gaps and prioritise remediation.
AAIAF · Governance · OversightAAIAF brings technical evaluation, governance and lifecycle monitoring into a structured assurance approach. Its eight domains connect evidence to decisions, with critical safeguards that cannot be offset by an aggregate score.
Developed through CognitiveAI Labs and being refined through expert feedback. AISTAI’s programme will build on this work through further research and evaluation.
Explore Assurance Cloud ↗Claims about an AI system should be supported by relevant, measurable and independently reviewable evidence.
A strong average result cannot compensate for a failed critical safeguard. Human accountability and meaningful intervention matter.
Evaluation continues after deployment through monitoring, incident learning and reassessment as systems and contexts change.
We welcome conversations with researchers, institutions, civil society and technical practitioners interested in evaluation methods, framework review and future pilot collaborations.